The module you spent 3 days on, a teammate ships in 30 minutes with Claude Code
Not a tool gap β a workflow gap. Score your AI coding efficiency.
Your current approach vs. what peers achieve
It's not the tool β it's how you use it.
How you probably use AI today
- 1 Type a function signature in your IDE, Cursor completes a few lines, you edit them
- 2 Get stuck, switch to ChatGPT, paste code back and forth
- 3 Debug iteratively, run tests manually
- 4 A module takes 3 days; AI involvement ~30%
SOTA workflow β no extra spend required
- 1 Write docs/specs/<feature>/spec.md first to nail down requirements
- 2 Agent reads spec + CLAUDE.md + existing code
- 3 Agent autonomously implements + writes tests + fixes failures
- 4 You review and merge β done in 30 minutes
The gap isn't whether you can use AI β it's whether you've connected project context + agent + spec-driven flow into one pipeline.
3 key actions that get you to SOTA β for free
Feed project knowledge to AI
Write CLAUDE.md / .cursorrules: project structure, tech stack, coding conventions, anti-patterns. AI stops guessing context.
Let the agent close the loop
Don't just use autocomplete β use agent mode so it reads files, writes code, runs tests on its own. You only review.
Spec-driven development
Write a spec before new features. An agent implementing from spec + writing tests produces an order of magnitude better output than verbal instructions.
Want to know your current AI-efficiency score?
Diagnosis tailored to Developer scenarios β benchmark report + concrete next steps in 5 minutes
Powered by the LoreJump benchmark system, referencing Anthropic / Thoughtworks / OSSF / DX Core 4 and other authoritative sources
Doesn't cover your scenario?
Tell us your specific scenario β we'll notify you first when the matching diagnosis opens
Tell us your scenario
Outside the 5 core groups β leave your email and a description, and we'll prioritize you when the matching diagnosis opens
Not your group? Try another: